Summary
- The Ninth Circuit has ruled that an agentic AI tool cannot violate the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (CFAA), as it is not considered a "person" under the law.
- This ruling arose from Amazon's attempt to block Perplexity's AI browser, which was accused of unauthorized access by circumventing Amazon's restrictions.
- The court emphasized that liability falls on the user directing the AI, not the AI itself or its creators, raising questions about user accountability in future cases.
- While this decision narrows CFAA interpretations, it leaves open the possibility of liability for companies like OpenAI and Anthropic under different circumstances involving their agentic tools.
Join the discussion — sign up to comment, upvote, and save articles.