Summary
- In a significant ruling, Judge Cronan has dismissed a putative class action against Supergoop for the second time.
- The plaintiffs alleged that Supergoop's sunscreen contains a lower SPF than advertised but failed to establish standing.
- The Court found that the plaintiffs inadequately pleaded injury-in-fact, leading to the dismissal of their claims.
- This ruling raises questions about consumer protection and the standards for establishing legal standing in similar cases.
Join the discussion — sign up to comment, upvote, and save articles.