Summary
- The Madras High Court has upheld the deletion of additions made under Section 68 concerning gains from penny stocks.
- The court emphasized that mere suspicion cannot substitute for concrete evidence linking the assessee to price manipulation.
- This ruling clarifies the evidentiary standards required in cases involving penny stock transactions.
- The decision may influence future assessments and investigations into similar income tax cases.
Join the discussion ā sign up to comment, upvote, and save articles.