Summary
- The Madhya Pradesh High Court has imposed a ₹75,000 cost on Advocate Anil Singh for filing three Public Interest Litigations challenging the appointment of the Chairman of the MP Private University Regulatory Commission.
- The Division Bench, led by Acting Chief Justice Vivek Rusia, ruled that the petitions were not entertainable as the Competent Authority had already closed the matter.
- Singh's petitions were deemed to be filed on behalf of a client involved in subsequent writ petitions, raising concerns over potential misuse of public funds and authority.
- This ruling underscores the court's stance against frivolous litigation and highlights the importance of prior inquiries by competent authorities.
Join the discussion — sign up to comment, upvote, and save articles.