Summary
- A fencing company is urging the U.S. Supreme Court to review a Federal Circuit ruling that deemed its patents invalid due to the omission of a co-inventor.
- The case revolves around patents for an outdoor railing product and an infringement suit against a competitor.
- The company's legal team argues that the decision could lead to "absurd results" in patent law.
- A Supreme Court review could significantly impact how inventorship is determined in patent disputes moving forward.
Join the discussion ā sign up to comment, upvote, and save articles.