Summary
- The Kerala High Court has ruled that a person of unsound mind is competent to testify unless they cannot understand questions or provide rational answers.
- Justice A. Badharudeen upheld a conviction for rape, affirming the Sessions Court's judgment despite the accused's claims regarding the victim's mental condition.
- The Court emphasized that the victim demonstrated her ability to understand and respond during trial, countering arguments about her competency.
- This ruling clarifies witness competency standards under Section 118 of the Indian Evidence Act, potentially impacting future cases involving mentally challenged witnesses.
Join the discussion ā sign up to comment, upvote, and save articles.