Summary
- The Supreme Court has upheld a Bombay High Court verdict stating that saying 'dua' for electoral success does not constitute soliciting votes in the name of religion.
- This ruling came on September 25 in the case of Shaan E Hind vs. Muft Moham.
- The Court clarified that such prayers do not amount to undue influence during elections.
- This decision could have significant implications for how religious expressions are viewed in the context of electoral campaigns.
Join the discussion ā sign up to comment, upvote, and save articles.