Summary
- A federal court ruled that an escort service's accidental posting of a photograph including a model's face does not violate the federal nonconsensual porn statute.
- The case, Doe v. T.T., II, Inc., involved a plaintiff who provided nude photos for advertising but claimed one was mistakenly posted with her face.
- The court found that the photographs fell within exceptions for commercial pornographic content and were intended to assist both parties' businesses.
- This ruling highlights the complexities of consent and business arrangements in adult services, potentially impacting future cases involving similar disputes.
Join the discussion — sign up to comment, upvote, and save articles.