Supreme Court Daily Round-Up : February 13, 2026

Key Points:

• The Supreme Court has ruled that visually impaired candidates are allowed to engage scribes with qualifications exceeding 10+2 for the All India Bar Examination (AIBE) and Common Law Admission Test (CLAT).
• The Court addressed issues surrounding the ownership and control of telecom spectrum, stating that the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) cannot determine these factors.
• The Supreme Court dismissed a case from the Punjab and Haryana High Court, although specific details of the dismissal were not provided.

Background: The rulings stem from ongoing legal discussions regarding accessibility in examinations for visually impaired candidates and the regulatory framework governing telecom spectrum management. The AIBE and CLAT are significant examinations for aspiring lawyers in India, while the IBC is a law that governs insolvency proceedings.

What's Next: Further developments in these cases may arise as parties involved assess the implications of the Supreme Court's decisions on examination policies and telecom regulations.