Summary
- The Supreme Court is examining whether an appellate court must hear the accused on sentencing after overturning an acquittal.
- This inquiry stems from Section 386(a) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, which mandates sentencing if the accused is found guilty.
- The case references Kumar Exports v. Sharma Carpets, highlighting the legal precedent involved.
- The outcome could clarify procedural rights for defendants in criminal appeals and impact future sentencing practices.
Join the discussion ā sign up to comment, upvote, and save articles.