← Back to news

Madras HC: Suspicion Cannot Substitute Evidence in Penny-Stock LTCG Cases

TaxGuru
Read full article →taxguru.in

Summary

AI-Generated

Summary Pending

This article is queued for processing. Click to generate a summary now.

Madras HC dismisses Revenue appeals, holding suspicion cannot replace proof for Section 68 additions involving listed-share LTCG claims.The post Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence in Penny-Stock LTCG Cases: Madras HC deletes addition appeared first on TaxGuru .

Join the discussion — sign up to comment, upvote, and save articles.

Discussion

or to comment
Loading...

Loading discussion...